You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 4, April 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Abnormal Intraoperative Cholangiography

Treatment Options and Long-term Follow-up

Philip D. Kondylis, MD; Duncan R. Simmons, MD; Suresh K. Agarwal, MD; Kenneth A. Ciardiello, MD; Randolph B. Reinhold, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(4):347-350.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the long-term outcome in patients with filling defects on intraoperative cholangiography.

Design
Case series; retrospective review.

Setting
Community teaching hospital.

Patients
All patients (n=872) undergoing cholecystectomy from July 1993 through June 1995. Of 281 intraoperative cholangiograms performed, 89 had abnormal findings. Defects were classified as stone (n=47), unsure (n=29), and artifact (n= 13). Medical records were reviewed for immediate and long-term follow-up results.

Intervention
Need for common bile duct exploration (CBDE) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Outcome
Morbidity and interventions required 1 to 3 years after surgery.

Results
Of the 47 patients with suspected stones, 24 underwent successful operative bile duct clearance. One patient required irrigation. Of the 22 patients who left the operating room with unresolved stones, only 2 ERCPs were required. Of the 29 patients with unsure filling defects, operative clearance was successful in 1; irrigation achieved clearance in 4. Only 1 of the 24 patients who left the operating room with unsure filling defects required subsequent ERCP.

Conclusions
Observation of common bile duct defects of 4 mm or smaller is an appropriate clinical alternative. Defects of 5 mm or larger represent a gray area, although few 5- to 8-mm stones will cause subsequent symptoms. In our experience, if stone extraction is clinically important, especially if the patient has jaundice, open CBDE is more effective than transcystic laparoscopic CBDE.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:347-350



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Hospital of St Raphael, New Haven, Conn.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.