You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 4, April 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Malpractice Litigation Involving Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Cost, Cause, and Consequences

Kenneth A. Kern, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(4):392-398.


Abstract

Objective
To analyze 44 cases of malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cost, cause, and consequences of civil court actions.

Design
Survey of national jury verdict reporting services, covering 20 states during the 39-month interval from January 1, 1993, to April 30, 1996. The 44 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed during the 40-month interval from February 1, 1989, to June 30, 1992.

Main Outcome Measures
Types of injuries leading to litigation, morbidity and mortality from injuries, trial verdicts, and cost of liability payments.

Results
The 44 injuries composed 4 main categories of injuries: (1) bile duct, n=27, 61%; (2) bowel, n=7, 16%; (3) major vascular, n=4, 9%; and (4) other, n=6, 14%. Bowel injuries involved trocar or cautery injury; vascular injuries all involved trocars. There were 7 deaths (16%) overall from either septic peritonitis resulting from bowel injury (4 patients [57%]) or bile peritonitis involving spills or cystic duct leaks (3 patients [43%]). No deaths resulted from injury to main bile ducts. Of the 44 cases, 21 (48%) settled out of court (mean payment, $469 711). Of the remaining 23 cases proceeding to trial, 19 (83%) were defended successfully while 4 (17%) concluded with plaintiff jury verdicts (mean payment, $188 772).

Conclusions
Frequent settlements of cases involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy injuries that are litigated have resulted in a selection of cases of increased defensibility at trial. The high mortality rate from bowel injuries is a new medicolegal finding in laparoscopic cholecystectomies, as expensive to settle (mean payment, $438 000) as laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct injury (mean payment, $507 000).

Arch Surg. 1997;132:392-398



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Conn, and University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury: A Population-Based Study of 152 776 Cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry
Waage and Nilsson
Arch Surg 2006;141:1207-1213.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims.
Gandhi et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:488-496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Management Observations From Litigation Involving Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
McLean
Arch Surg 2006;141:643-648.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy and Survival in Medicare Beneficiaries
Flum et al.
JAMA 2003;290:2168-2173.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine vs Selective Intraoperative Cholangiography During Cholecystectomy
Talamini
JAMA 2003;289:1691-1692.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.