This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A 10-Year Review

Eileen M. Bulger, MD; Douglas G. Smith, MD; Ronald V. Maier, MD; Gregory J. Jurkovich, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(4):435-439.

Abstract
Background
The effect of recent advances in critical care and the emphasis on early fracture fixation in patients with fat embolism syndrome (FES) are unknown.

Objective
To better define FES in current practice by conducting a 10-year review of the experiences at our level I trauma center.

Design
The medical records of all patients in whom FES was diagnosed from July 1, 1985, to July 1, 1995, were reviewed for demographics, injury severity and pattern, diagnostic criteria, and management.

Setting
A level I trauma center.

Results
Twenty-seven patients with clinically apparent FES were identified. This resulted in an incidence of 0.9% of all patients with long-bone fractures. The mean injury severity score was 9.5 (range, 4-22). The diagnosis of FES was made by clinical criteria, including hypoxia, 26 patients (96%); mental status changes, 16 patients (59%); petechiae, 9 patients (33%); temperature higher than 39°C, 19 patients (70%); tachycardia (heart rate >120 beats per minute), 25 patients (93%); thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150x109/L), 10 patients (37%); and unexplained anemia, 18 patients (67%). Thirteen patients (48%) had multiple long-bone fractures, and 14 patients (52%) had a single long-bone fracture. Seven patients (26%) had open fractures, 15 (56%) had closed fractures, and the remaining 5 (18%) had both. Of the total fracture population, the distribution was 81% closed, 15% open, and 4% both. Management included ventilatory support for 12 (44%) of the patients; early operative fixation was emphasized, and 74% of the fractures were stabilized within 24 hours of injury. This was comparable with 76% of the total fracture population. There were 2 deaths, for a mortality of 7%.

Conclusions
(1) Fat embolism syndrome remains a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on clinical criteria. (2) Clinically apparent FES is unusual but may be masked by associated injuries in more severely injured patients. (3) No association could be identified between FES and a specific fracture pattern or location. (4) Early intramedullary fixation does not increase the incidence or severity of FES. (5) While FES seems to have a direct effect on survival, the management of FES remains primarily supportive.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:435-439

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Bulger, Maier, and Jurkovich) and Orthopedics (Dr Smith), University of Washington, Seattle.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism
Jorens et al.
Eur Respir J 2009;34:452-474.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Critical Care Issues in the Patient After Major Joint Replacement
Memtsoudis et al.
J Intensive Care Med 2007;22:92-104.
ABSTRACT  

Fat Embolism Syndrome: Clinical Examination Is Still the Preferable Diagnostic Method
Georgopoulos and Bouros
Chest 2003;123:982-983.
FULL TEXT  

When is the best time to fix fractures?
Revell and Porter
Trauma 2002;4:159-167.
ABSTRACT  

Fat Embolism: A Central Nervous System Problem
Byrick
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2002;6:39-42.
ABSTRACT  

Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Fat Embolism Syndrome by Diffusion-Weighted MRI (Starfield Pattern)
Parizel et al.
Stroke 2001;32:2942-2944.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Case of Fatal Paradoxical Fat Embolism Syndrome Detected by Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography
Kariya et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2001;92:688-689.
FULL TEXT