You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 2, February 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bariatric Surgery
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Gastrojejunostomy During Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Analysis of 3 Techniques

Rodrigo Gonzalez, MD; Edward Lin, DO; Kota R. Venkatesh, MD; Steven P. Bowers, MD; C. Daniel Smith, MD

Arch Surg. 2003;138:181-184.

Hypothesis  Although perceived as a more technically demanding and time-consuming technique, the hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with fewer complications and lower costs than stapled techniques.

Design  A retrospective medical record review of prospectively collected data.

Setting  University hospital.

Patients  One hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2001.

Intervention  Three techniques were compared: hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA), circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA), and linear-stapled anastomosis (LSA).

Main Outcome Measures  Operative costs, including the cost of stapling devices, the cost of sutures, and operative times, were compared. Rates of anastomotic strictures, leaks, marginal ulcers, bleeding, and wound infections were determined.

Results  Eighty-seven patients underwent HSA; 13, CSA; and 8, LSA. Supply costs per patient were higher for CSA ($955) and LSA ($435) than for HSA ($2) (P<.001). The mean ± SEM operative time for laparoscopic RYGB was longer when performing CSA than HSA or LSA (285 ± 22 vs 215 ± 8 and 204 ± 28 minutes, respectively; P<.001). Stricture rates were higher after CSA than HSA and LSA (4 [31%] of 13 patients vs 3 [3%] of 87 patients and 0 of 8 patients, respectively; P<.01). The wound infection rate was higher after CSA than HSA and LSA (3 [23%] of 13 patients vs 1 [1%] of 87 patients and 0 of 8 patients, respectively; P<.001). There was no difference in anastomotic bleeding, and no anastomotic leaks occurred.

Conclusions  In this experience, hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic RYGB reduced operating room supply costs and was completed faster than stapled techniques. However, these differences may reflect the learning curve because these techniques were used early in our experience. Lower postoperative stricture and wound infection rates seem to be the primary benefits of the HSA technique.


From the Emory Endosurgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2003;138(2):125.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Laparoscopic Revision of Gastrogastric Stricture With a Transoral Circular Stapler
Parikh and Gagner
SURG INNOV 2007;14:225-230.
ABSTRACT  

The Gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Himpens
SURG INNOV 2004;11:171-177.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.