You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 8, August 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Vascular Surgery
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Results of 101 Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repairs From a Single Surgical Practice

Sachinder Singh Hans, MD; Raywin R. Huang, PhD

Arch Surg. 2003;138:898-901.

Hypotheses  The results of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs from a solo community hospital–based practice are comparable to those reported from large university referral medical centers. Patients younger than 70 years, arriving in the emergency department with stable hemodynamics, and undergoing prompt operation have better outcome.

Design  A retrospective review from an ongoing vascular surgery registry.

Setting  Two midsized (300-bed) community hospitals. One hundred one consecutive patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms who were undergoing open surgical repair by a single surgeon (S.S.H.) during a 21-year period were reviewed.

Main Outcome Measures  Operative mortality; cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and gastrointestinal complications; and coagulation abnormalities were recorded. Iatrogenic complications and length of hospital stay were noted. Preoperative and intraoperative factors affecting mortality were studied.

Results  Fifty-three patients survived ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (operative mortality, 47.5%). A favorable outcome was observed in patients (1) younger than 70 years, (2) with a hematocrit of more than 35% at presentation, and (3) with emergency department to operating room times of less than 120 minutes. Increasing experience of the surgeon did not result in improved survival.

Conclusion  The results of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs from community-based practice are comparable to those reported from university referral medical centers.


From the Department of Surgery, St John Macomb Hospital, Warren (Dr Hans), and William Beaumont Hospital Research Institute, Royal Oak (Dr Huang), Mich.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A surgical emergency
Sorelli et al.
BMJ 2009;339:b2302-b2302.
FULL TEXT  

Improved Survival After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture by Offering Both Open and Endovascular Repair
Wibmer et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:544-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgeon Experience and Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Forbes
Arch Surg 2004;139:343-343.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.