 |
|
Blunt Carotid Artery Injury
The Futility of Aggressive Screening and Diagnosis
John C. Mayberry, MD;
Carlos V. Brown, MD;
Richard J. Mullins, MD;
George C. Velmahos, MD
Arch Surg. 2004;139:609-613.
Background Blunt carotid artery injury (BCI) remains a rare but potentially lethal condition. Recent studies recommend that aggressive screening based on broad criteria (hyperextension-hyperflexion mechanism of injury, basilar skull fracture, cervical spine injury, midface fracture, mandibular fracture, diffuse axonal brain injury, and neck seat-belt sign) increases the rate of diagnosis of BCI by 9-fold. If this recommendation becomes a standard of care, it will require a major consumption of resources and may give rise to liability claims. The benefits of aggressive screening are unclear because the natural history of asymptomatic BCI is unknown and the existing treatments are controversial.
Hypothesis The lack of an aggressive angiographic screening protocol does not result in delayed BCI diagnosis or BCI-related neurologic deficits.
Methods A 10-year medical record review of patients with BCI was undertaken in 2 level I academic trauma centers. In both centers, urgent screening for BCI was performed in patients with focal neurologic signs or neurologic symptoms unexplainable by results of computed tomography of the brain as well as in selected patients undergoing angiography for another reason.
Results Of 35 212 blunt trauma admissions, 17 patients (0.05%) were diagnosed as having BCI. Six showed no evidence of BCI-related neurologic symptoms during hospitalization or prior to death as a result of associated injuries. Eleven sustained a BCI-related stroke, 9 of whom had it within 2 hours of injury. The remaining 2 had a delayed diagnosis (9 and 12 hours after injury) and received only anticoagulation because the lesions were surgically inaccessible. Just 1 of these 2 patients met the criteria for BCI screening and could have been offered earlier treatment, of uncertain benefit, if we had adopted an aggressive screening policy.
Conclusions Of the few patients with BCI, most remain asymptomatic or develop neurologic deficits shortly after injury. Although a widely applied, resource-consuming screening program may increase the rate of early diagnosis of BCI, an improvement in outcome is uncertain. A cost-effectiveness analysis should be done before trauma surgeons accept an aggressive screening protocol as the standard of care.
From the Departments of Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Divisions, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (Drs Mayberry and Mullins); and Los Angeles County/University of Southern California (Drs Brown and Velmahos), Los Angeles.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(6):583.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Treatment for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Equivalence of Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Agents
Cothren et al.
Arch Surg 2009;144:685-690.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Whole-Body CT Trauma Imaging with Adapted and Optimized CT Angiography of the Craniocervical Vessels: Do We Need an Extra Screening Examination?
Langner et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1902-1907.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Invited Commentary
Biffl
RadioGraphics 2008;28:1709-1710.
FULL TEXT
POSTTRAUMATIC CEREBRAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE OR SEVERE HEAD TRAUMA
Menon et al.
Neurology 2007;68:2160-2160.
FULL TEXT
Carotid Artery Injury
Shapiro
Arch Surg 2005;140:211-212.
FULL TEXT
|
