You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 1, January 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Life
 •Burns
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cost-Utility Analysis Applied to the Treatment of Burn Patients in a Specialized Center

José-Luis Alfonso Sánchez, PhD, MD; Sergio Blasco Perepérez, PhD; Julio López Bastida, PhD; Mercedes Melgar Martínez, MsC

Arch Surg. 2007;142(1):50-57.

Objective  To discover the total costs and quality of life of burn patients in a specialist center classified by diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).

Design  Prospective study of 5-year follow-up from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2001.

Setting  Burn Center of Valencia.

Patients  A total of 898 patients treated at the Burn Center of Valencia.

Main Outcome Measures  Hospital, extrahospital, caregiving, labor, and social costs of the burn patients grouped by DRG (code 457: extensive burns without operating room procedure; code 458: nonextensive burns with skin graft; code 459: nonextensive burns with wound debridement or other operating room procedure; code 460: nonextensive burns without operating room procedure; or code 472: extensive burns with operating room procedure) were studied. The costs were compared with those that the DRG system assigns. The quality of life of the patients at the end of the follow-up period was also studied. To measure quality of life, the EuroQol 5-Dimensions survey was used. Utility calculations and cost-utility analysis were undertaken according to life expectancy.

Results  The number of quality-adjusted life-years produced by the center was 13 577, with a mean quality-of-life level on release from the study of 0.87. The mean cost per patient, including the social and labor costs, was $95 551, with health care costs amounting to only 10%. The mean cost per quality-adjusted life-year was $686.

Conclusions  The labor costs were the most important and amounted to 56%; together with the social costs, these constituted 85% of the total costs. The DRG code 456 was an option dominated by the remaining DRG codes 458 through 460 and 472. Given the high costs of treating burn patients, a clear health care policy is urgently needed.


Author Affiliations: Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Valencia, Valencia (Dr Sánchez); Preventive Medicine Service (Dr Sánchez) and General Direction Department (Dr Perepérez), Consortium University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia; Servicio de Evaluación y Planificatión, Servicio Canario de Salud, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands (Dr Bastida); and FIS, Ministry of Health, Madrid (Ms Martínez), Spain.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Cost-Utility Analysis Applied to the Treatment of Burn Patients in a Specialized Center—Invited Critique
Richard L. Gamelli
Arch Surg. 2007;142(1):57.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.