This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cardiovascular System, Other  • Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery  • Vascular Surgery  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Samer F. Najjar, MD; Kyle H. Mueller, MD; Michael B. Ujiki, MD; Mark D. Morasch, MD; Jon S. Matsumura, MD; Mark K. Eskandari, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1049-1052.

Hypothesis  Percutaneous endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) has better outcomes than traditional open surgical repair.

Design  Single-center retrospective review.

Setting  University hospital tertiary referral center.

Patients  Thirty-seven RAAAs treated using endovascular repair (n = 15) or open surgery (n = 22).

Interventions  From January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2005, 15 RAAAs were treated with endovascular stent graft exclusion using commercially available systems. Twenty-two other patients undergoing standard open surgical repair during the same interval comprised a control group for comparison.

Main Outcome Measures  Early outcomes of percutaneous endovascular repair of RAAAs.

Results  Among the endovascular group, the mean ± SD age was 73 ± 9.8 years, 86.6% were men (n = 13), and 20.0% had a preoperative systolic blood pressure of 80 mm Hg or lower (n = 3). An entirely percutaneous procedure was performed in the final 11 patients using arterial closure systems. Technical success of attempted endovascular exclusion was 100.0%. The mean ± SD procedure time (107 ± 30 minutes), transfusion requirements (6.6 ± 4.7 U), and length of stay (3.0 ± 6.8 days) were statistically significantly reduced compared with open surgery. The 30-day mortality was 6.7% (1 of 15) compared with an open surgery 30-day mortality of 13.6% (3 of 22). No late complications (pseudoaneurysm, infection, lymphocele, or neuropathy) occurred after a completely percutaneous technique during a mean follow-up of 12 months.

Conclusion  Percutaneous endovascular repair of RAAAs is a more expedient and less morbid alternative than open surgical repair.

Author Affiliations: Division of Vascular Surgery (Drs Najjar, Morasch, Matsumura, and Eskandari) and Department of Surgery (Drs Mueller, Ujiki, and Eskandari), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Percutaneous Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms—Invited Critique
Bruce A. Perler
Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1053.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Femoral Arterial Access Management for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Evolution and Outcome
Shafique et al.
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2009;21:29-33.
ABSTRACT