You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 4, April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Public Health
 •Obesity
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Quality of Life
 •Bariatric Surgery
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes at Designated Centers of Excellence vs Nondesignated Programs

Edward H. Livingston, MD

Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):319-325.

Objective  To compare outcomes of patients undergoing bariatric procedures in hospitals designated as centers of excellence compared with nondesignated hospitals.

Design  The 2005 National Inpatient Survey was used to compare outcomes at designated vs nondesignated hospitals. In addition to conventional null-hypothesis statistical testing to assess differences, effect sizes were calculated to estimate the clinical significance for observed differences.

Results  Centers of excellence performed substantially more operations than nondesignated centers. Despite this, outcomes were equivalent at centers of excellence and hospitals without this designation. Volume-outcome modeling attempting to identify the optimal number for a minimum volume threshold for bariatric operations revealed that annual procedure volume has a weak effect on outcomes. Similarly, many variables that were statistically significantly different between centers and noncenters proved to be clinically unimportant by effect size analysis. Risk adjustment was effectively achieved by using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality–supplied variables all-payer severity-adjusted diagnostic related group expected charges and deaths.

Conclusions  Designation as a bariatric surgery center of excellence does not ensure better outcomes. Neither does high annual procedure volume. Extra expenses associated with center of excellence designation may not be warranted.


Author Affiliations: Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, and North Texas Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs, Dallas, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes at Designated Centers of Excellence vs Nondesignated Programs—Invited Critique
Stanley Frencher, Jr, Karl Y. Bilimoria, and Clifford Ko
Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):325.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect Size Estimation: A Necessary Component of Statistical Analysis
Livingston et al.
Arch Surg 2009;144:706-712.
FULL TEXT  

Surgical Treatment of Obesity -- Weighing the Facts
Robinson
NEJM 2009;361:520-521.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.