You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 6, June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Congenital Malformations
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Pediatric Surgery
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Use of a Spring-Loaded Silo for Gastroschisis

Impact on Practice Patterns and Outcomes

Aaron R. Jensen, MD; John H. T. Waldhausen, MD; Stephen S. Kim, MD

Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):516-519.

Objective  To evaluate the impact of the use of a bedside-placed spring-loaded silo (SLS) on practice patterns and on outcomes for infants with gastroschisis.

Design  Retrospective review comparing neonates with gastroschisis treated before and after the implementation of selective SLS placement.

Setting  Tertiary referral center.

Patients  Of 91 consecutive neonates admitted for initial treatment of gastroschisis between January 1998 and August 2007, 45 were admitted before and 46 were admitted after implementation of the SLS.

Main Outcome Measures  Immediate fascial closure rate, infection rate, time to fascial closure, time to initiation of enteral feeding, time to achievement of full enteral feeds, time of hyperalimentation requirement, and length of hospital stay.

Results  The rate of immediate fascial closure was lower in the postimplementation group (58% before vs 20% after implementation, P < .001). Overall length of stay, time to enteral feeding, and infection rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusions  The use of an SLS placed at the bedside has resulted in lower immediate fascial closure rates for infants with gastroschisis without significant detrimental clinical outcome. The main benefit of using the bedside-placed SLS is the avoidance of urgent surgical intervention. For patients undergoing delayed fascial closure, use of the bedside SLS resulted in shorter times to definitive fascial closure.


Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Drs Jensen, Waldhausen, and Kim); and Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle (Drs Waldhausen and Kim).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.