This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic

Negative Appendectomy No Longer Ignored

Tetsuji Fujita, MD; Katuhiko Yanaga, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1023-1025.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Early appendectomy has been the treatment of choice for patients with confirmed or suspected acute appendicitis. The surgical residents have been taught that although observation may reduce the rate of unnecessary appendectomy, such a policy will increase the rate of perforation, which undoubtedly results in increased morbidity and mortality. Whereas appendectomy has been a safe procedure with a mortality rate of 0.4% to 0.08% for uncomplicated appendicitis,^1-2 in some series perforated appendicitis is associated with an unacceptable mortality rate as high as 12%.¹ For patients with acute appendicitis, therefore, the perforation rate has been used as an index of quality of care. In a recent study, the association between time from the onset of symptoms and risk of appendiceal rupture was retrospectively studied in 219 patients who had undergone appendectomy for pathologically proven appendicitis.³ The risk was negligible within the first 24 hours, climbed . . . [Full Text of this Article]

REEVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR ACUTE APPENDICITIS


APPENDECTOMY DURING THE NIGHT

CAN ACUTE APPENDICITIS BE MANAGED CONSERVATIVELY?

OPEN OR LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY?

AUTHOR INFORMATION