You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 10, October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


Hospital Costs of Conventional and Stapled 1-Day Hemorrhoidectomy

Andrea Cariati, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Every year nearly 40 000 hemorrhoidectomies are performed in Italy, France, and England, and nearly 320 000 hemorrhoidectomies are performed in the United States.1 The difference in hospital costs between 1-day conventional and stapler hemorrhoidectomy is nearly {euro}800 (US $1130) (the cost of the stapler). This means that if in a year all hemorrhoidectomies in the United States were performed using the stapler technique, the annual hospital bill would be {euro}256 million (US $361 million) more expensive.

Moreover, randomized controlled trials report better results for conventional hemorrhoidectomy2-3; stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a safe technique but carries a significantly higher incidence of recurrence and additional operations when compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy.4 Conventional hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan Morgan or Ferguson techniques) can reduce hospital costs in the United States by {euro}256 million and by nearly {euro}32 million ($US 45 million) in Italy, France, and England. In my opinion, it is very important to avoid . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Long-term Outcomes of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy vs Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Pasquale Giordano, Gianpiero Gravante, Roberto Sorge, Lauren Ovens, and Piero Nastro
Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):266-272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Hospital Costs of Conventional and Stapled 1-Day Hemorrhoidectomy—Reply
Pasquale Giordano, Gianpiero Gravante, Lauren Ovens, and Piero Nastro
Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):980.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.