 |
|
Is Laparoscopic Colectomy a Good Operation for Colon Cancer?—Reply
Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD, MS;
Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
In reply
Population-based studies, institutional reviews, and prospective randomized controlled trials have all demonstrated low lymph node counts after colectomy for cancer. This is the reality of what is happening in the United States and around the world. Patients often have an inadequate number of lymph nodes resected and examined.1 Thus, the bigger message is that if the surgical community believes that resections of fewer than 12 nodes (or some established benchmark, as the relationship between node counts and survival is continuous) are inadequate, then we need to work harder to cooperate with our pathologists to ensure that this benchmark is met. It is encouraging that lymph node counts after colectomy are increasing in the United States,2 but there is still room for improvement.
Nonetheless, the issue of inadequate nodal evaluation exists for both the open and laparoscopic procedures,3 . . . [Full Text of this Article]
AUTHOR INFORMATION
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Use and Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Cancer in the United States
Karl Y. Bilimoria, David J. Bentrem, Heidi Nelson, Steven J. Stryker, Andrew K. Stewart, Nathaniel J. Soper, Thomas R. Russell, and Clifford Y. Ko
Arch Surg. 2008;143(9):832-840.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Is Laparoscopic Colectomy a Good Operation for Colon Cancer?
Fadi F. Attiyeh
Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):290-291.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
