You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 6, June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Feature
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Image of the Month—Quiz Case

Clark J. Zeebregts, MD; Barry Slot, MD; Mariël Brinkhuis, MD, PhD; Jos J. G. M. Gerritsen, MD, PhD
From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Zeebregts and Gerritsen) and Radiology (Dr Slot), Medisch Spectrum Twente, and Laboratorium Pathologie Oost Nederland (Dr Brinkhuis), Enschede, the Netherlands. Dr Zeebregts is now with the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Arch Surg. 2004;139:687-688.

INTRODUCTION

A 31-year-old, otherwise healthy woman was admitted with recurrent epigastric pain of 4 years' duration. Results of physical and laboratory examinations showed no abnormalities. A gastroduodenoscopy showed a homogeneous, round bulging structure, of which biopsy results showed normal gastric mucosa. A single-slice spiral computed tomography scan demonstrated a 7 x 5-cm well-circumscribed mass, located dorsal to and in narrow contact with the stomach (Figure 1), that could not be fully separated from the normal pancreatic tail. However, magnetic resonance images showed no relation to the pancreas. Through a midline laparotomy, the mass was found to be adherent to the stomach but not to the pancreas. The tumor was removed by local excision, and the gastric wall was closed. The findings in Figure 2 were noted at histologic examination. The patient had an uneventful recovery.



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1.




View larger version (184K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2.



What Is the Diagnosis?
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •What is the diagnosis?

A. Gastric leiomyoma
B. Gastric duplication cyst
C. Pancreatic pseudocyst
D. Omental cyst

Answer

SECTION EDITOR: GRACE S. ROZYCKI, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Image of the Month—Diagnosis
Arch Surg. 2004;139(6):688.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.