 |
|
Wrong-Side/Wrong-Site, Wrong-Procedure, and Wrong-Patient Adverse Events
Are They Preventable?
Samuel C. Seiden, MD;
Paul Barach, MD, MPH
Arch Surg. 2006;141:931-939.
Hypothesis Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events (WSPEs) are devastating, unacceptable, and often result in litigation, but their frequency and root causes are unknown. Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient events are likely more common than realized, with little evidence that current prevention practice is adequate.
Design Analysis of several databases demonstrates that WSPEs occur across all specialties, with high numbers noted in orthopedic and dental surgery. Databases analyzed included: (1) the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), (2) the Florida Code 15 mandatory reporting system, (3) the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Closed Claims Project database, and (4) a novel Web-based system for collecting WSPE cases (http://www.wrong-side.org).
Results The NPDB recorded 5940 WSPEs (2217 wrong-side surgical procedures and 3723 wrong-treatment/wrong-procedure errors) in 13 years. Florida Code 15 occurrences of WSPEs number 494 since 1991, averaging 75 events per year since 2000. The ASA Closed Claims Project has recorded 54 cases of WSPEs. Analysis of WSPE cases, including WSPE cases submitted to http://www.wrong-side.org, suggest several common causes of WSPEs and recurrent systemic failures. Based on these findings, we estimate that there are 1300 to 2700 WSPEs annually in the United States. Despite a significant number of cases, reporting of WSPEs is virtually nonexistent, with reports in the lay press far more common than reports in the medical literature. Our research suggests clear factors that contribute to the occurrence of WSPEs, as well as ways to reduce them.
Conclusions Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events, although rare, are more common than health care providers and patients appreciate. Prevention of WSPEs requires new and innovative technologies, reporting of case occurrence, and learning from successful safety initiatives (such as in transfusion medicine and other high-risk nonmedical industries), while reducing the shame associated with these events.
Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill (Dr Seiden); Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Epidemiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla (Dr Barach).
RELATED LETTERS
Wrong-Site Surgeries Are Preventable
Richard J. Croteau
Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1111-1112.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Wrong-Site Surgeries Are Preventable—Reply
Samuel C. Seiden and Paul Barach
Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1112.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Integration of Patient Safety Technologies Into Sclerotherapy for Varicose Veins
Sibbitt et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2008;42:446-455.
ABSTRACT
Surgical Confusions in Ophthalmology
Simon et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1515-1522.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Wrong-Site Surgeries Are Preventable Reply
Seiden and Barach
Arch Surg 2007;142:1112-1112.
FULL TEXT
Wrong-Site Surgeries Are Preventable
Croteau
Arch Surg 2007;142:1111-1112.
FULL TEXT
Identifying patients in hospital: are more adverse events waiting to happen?
Perry and Scott
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:160-160.
FULL TEXT
|
