You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 4, April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Education
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Midlevel Practitioner Workforce Analysis at a University-Affiliated Teaching Hospital

Orlando C. Kirton, MD; Marilyn A. Folcik, RN, MPH; Michael E. Ivy, MD; Rebecca Calabrese, MBA, RTT; Eric Dobkin, MD; Judith Pepe, MD; John Mah, MD; Kevin Keating, MD; Marc Palter, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142:336-341.

Objective  To quantify midlevel practitioner (MLP) staffing requirements based on the volume and complexity of patient care and the duty-hour constraints of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 80-hour workweek.

Design  Data extracted from Eclipsys Sunrise Decision Support Manager, the hospital financial budget, and census reports; and MLP, resident, and subspecialty fellow clinical, operative, and on-call schedules, and educational curriculum. Fiscal year 2005 patient census and hours of required care were defined by attending physician service and/or patient care location. Volume of patient care activity for MLPs, residents, and subspecialty fellows were established by verified self-reporting methodology.

Setting  Urban teaching hospital with 867 beds, of which 116 are surgical beds (which include 36 intensive care unit beds and 12 step-down beds).

Participants  Attending physicians, MLPs, residents, and subspecialty fellows.

Main Outcome Measures  Coverage index (available staffing hours [residents, subspecialty fellows, and MLPs] divided by the clinical coverage schedule), and the workload staffing efficiency index (number of clinical hours of patient care activities divided by the hours of available staff for a specific clinical service).

Results  The workload staffing efficiency index and the coverage index identified 4 services that benefited from the addition of new MLPs.

Conclusion  We developed a quantitative MLP staffing methodology based on patient volume and the type and complexity of direct and indirect patient care activities, encompassing the roles and availability of residents, subspecialty fellows, and MLPs.


Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Conn.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost Implications of Reduced Work Hours and Workloads for Resident Physicians
Nuckols et al.
NEJM 2009;360:2202-2215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.