 |
 |

Trauma and Coagulopathy—Invited Critique
Elliott R. Haut, MD
Arch Surg. 2008;143(8):802.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
When I first started reading "Trauma and Coagulopathy: A New Paradigm to Consider" by MacLeod, I was skeptical. I liked the "old" paradigm. Most trauma surgeons accept the theory that trauma-associated coagulopathy is a secondary phenomenon. Bleeding leads to coagulopathy, hypothermia, and acidosis, which make up the "lethal triad." As each of these 3 components worsens after major trauma, they exacerbate one another and patients begin a downward spiral known as the "bloody vicious cycle." The concept of abbreviated "damage-control" surgery to stop this sequence before irreversible physiologic exhaustion is the current tactic in cases of exsanguinating trauma. This approach makes intuitive sense and has been a way of life for my entire surgical career. It is a framework to educate fellows, residents, students, and staff in the clinical treatment of severely injured patients at trauma centers across around the world.
However, on further consideration, I . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
RELATED ARTICLE
Trauma and Coagulopathy: A New Paradigm to Consider
Jana B. A. MacLeod
Arch Surg. 2008;143(8):797-801.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|